Home
|
YooskTV
|
Members
|
Public Figures
|
Features
|
Search
|
Journalists
|
Site Guide - FAQs
|
I'd like to ask
569 people in 214 cities are asking questions to 1,049 people
Login
Username
Password
Remember me
Forgot your password?
Question
Question
Craig Murray
, Do you believe there are grounds for going after Tony Blair and George Bush for human rights abuses? Are there any leading figures you think might have human rights cases to answer?
Asked by
bonzo1
on Nov 07 2007 11:22:11 AM
and supported by 26 members
26
Answer
I have no doubt whatsoever that in terms of international law Tony Blair and George W. Bush are guilty of major breaches of international law, which in the past have been shown to be breaches that can be sanctioned, where action can be taken. I think the first reference for that has to be the statutes of the Nuremberg tribunal, which made absolutely plain that launching an aggressive war and planning and conspiring an aggressive war, including not using diplomacy in good faith, was a war crime, in fact was the most fundamental war crime. I think the launching of the war against Iraq on the basis of lies, and the fact that they sought an aggressive war against Iraq for a long time is undoubtedly a sanctionable war crime, and that's the most important answer. There are then further breaches of international law. Under the Hague convention, once you have occupied a country it is illegal to exploit its resources, or to change its laws. The Hague convention of 1907 is quite explicit on that point. And when Bush and Blair obtained the legalisation of the occupation of Iraq, post-facto, by a Security Council resolution, that Security Council resolution specifically said they must abide by the Hague convention. They nonetheless went on to break the Hague convention by privatising hundreds of Iraqi companies and giving their assets to American companies, which was done by the US provisional administration, and was a despoliation of Iraq, contrary to the Hague convention. So, you’ve got two areas there, launching an aggressive war and then economic exploitation of a conquered country, both of which are plainly illegal in international law. And in both areas Bush and Blair, and on the Nuremberg precedents their foreign ministers or secretaries of state, their top military leadership and others are plainly guilty.
MORE!
Comment
Topics you are talking about:
All Topics
Politics
World Affairs
Local Issues
Sport
Science and Technology
Business
Crime
Environment
Arts and entertainment
Media
People you are asking:
Lynne Featherstone
Barack Obama
Alistair Darling
David Miliband
david milliband
Gordon Brown
James Purnell
Gerry Adams
Ian Levitt
Brian Barwick
Jeff Winter
Banksy
Adam Crozier
Jeremy Hunt
Hazel Blears
Blog
|
Contact Us
|
Answering on Yoosk
|
Start your own Yoosk
|
Advertisers
|
About Us
|
Terms of Service
|
Privacy Policy
|
Widget