Home
|
YooskTV
|
Members
|
Public Figures
|
Features
|
Search
|
Journalists
|
Site Guide - FAQs
|
I'd like to ask
569 people in 214 cities are asking questions to 1,049 people
Login
Username
Password
Remember me
Forgot your password?
Question
Question
Becky Slater
, This is a quote from the British Plastics Foundation: "The BPF believes there would be little logic in taxing plastic carrier bags, as they are not a significant litter problem and they do not represent a significant environmental impact. Just 4% of crude oil consumption is used for all plastics, and only 2% for all films, of which plastic bags is a very small proportion. 85% of oil is burned as fuel or heating. Plastic bags are extraordinarily energy-efficient in manufacture, and more so than paper bags. Not only do they prevent waste of goods carried, but the embodied energy can be recovered either by recycling or via energy-from-waste systems." With plastic bag usage are we concentrating on the wrong issue? Or is this quote an example of reluctance to accept accountability?
Asked by
MTyrrell
on Oct 30 2007 10:28:13 PM
and supported by 28 members
28
Comment
Topics you are talking about:
All Topics
Politics
World Affairs
Local Issues
Sport
Science and Technology
Business
Crime
Environment
Arts and entertainment
Media
People you are asking:
Lynne Featherstone
Barack Obama
Alistair Darling
David Miliband
david milliband
Gordon Brown
James Purnell
Gerry Adams
Ian Levitt
Brian Barwick
Jeff Winter
Banksy
Adam Crozier
Jeremy Hunt
Hazel Blears
Blog
|
Contact Us
|
Answering on Yoosk
|
Start your own Yoosk
|
Advertisers
|
About Us
|
Terms of Service
|
Privacy Policy
|
Widget